New York Court of Appeals, 1989

People v. Simonds

People v. Simonds
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 23, 1989
73 N.Y.2d 945; 537 N.E.2d 621; 540 N.Y.S.2d 236; 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 290

People v. Simonds

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. Defendant’s argument with respect to an alleged Rosario (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) violation, *947 never having been raised in the trial court or the Appellate Division, is unpreserved for our review (People v Poole, 48 NY2d 144, 149-150), and his other arguments are without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.