Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 1989

Mead v. Levitt

Mead v. Levitt
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 4, 1989
74 N.Y.2d 634; 539 N.E.2d 1109; 541 N.Y.S.2d 981; 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 464

Mead v. Levitt

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

*636We agree with the Appellate Division’s statement, in its order granting leave to appeal, that the issues addressed by petitioner in his appellate brief are unpreserved and are, therefore, beyond the scope of our review.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur; Judge Kaye taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑