Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

New York Court of Appeals September 19, 1989

Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 74 N.Y.2d 836 (N.Y. 1989)

545 N.E.2d 632; 546 N.Y.S.2d 342; 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2900

Opinion of the Court

Motion [by defendants-appellants] for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion [by plaintiffs] for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to show that the order sought to be appealed from is final as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iv) of the Court of Appeals Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iv]).

Reference

Full Case Name: Carl Redcross, Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Travis Redcross, an Infant v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Miriam Solomon
Status: Published