New York Court of Appeals, 1989

Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided September 19, 1989
74 N.Y.2d 836; 545 N.E.2d 632; 546 N.Y.S.2d 342; 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2900

Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Opinion of the Court

Motion [by defendants-appellants] for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion [by plaintiffs] for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to show that the order sought to be appealed from is final as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iv) of the Court of Appeals Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iv]).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.