Barrett v. Morgenthau

New York Court of Appeals
Barrett v. Morgenthau, 74 N.Y.2d 907 (N.Y. 1989)
548 N.E.2d 1300; 549 N.Y.S.2d 649; 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3180

Barrett v. Morgenthau

Opinion of the Court

*909OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding to compel production of certain documents after his Freedom of Information Law request, initially directed to the District Attorney, was denied in a letter signed by the District Attorney’s records access officer. Inasmuch as the District Attorney failed to advise petitioner of the availability of an administrative appeal in the office (see, 21 NYCRR 1401.7 [b]) and failed to demonstrate in this proceeding that procedures for such an appeal had, in fact, even been established (see, Public Officers Law § 87 [1] [b]), he cannot be heard to complain that petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Michael Barrett v. Robert M. Morgenthau, as District Attorney of New York County
Cited By
14 cases
Status
Published