People v. Dennis
People v. Dennis
75 N.Y.2d 821; 551 N.E.2d 1237; 552 N.Y.S.2d 559; 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 145
Cases that cite this one
22 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Sanchez (N.Y. 2009)
- People v. Letterlough (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Singleton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- People v. Singleton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- People v. McKenny (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- People v. Fogle (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Sanchez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- People v. Marquez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- People v. Washington (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- People v. Carr-El (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- People v. Fatal (New York Supreme Court 2001)
- People v. Stokes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Kleingartner (New York County Courts 2000)
- People v. Vladimir S. F. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- People v. Wilkerson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Wright (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Mills (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Rivera (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- People v. Patton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- People v. Moses (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. White (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Charles (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as addressed the issue of sufficiency of the evidence to support defendant’s conviction of robbery in the second degree (146 AD2d 708).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.