People v. Falciglia

New York Court of Appeals
People v. Falciglia, 75 N.Y.2d 935 (N.Y. 1990)
555 N.Y.S.2d 681; 554 N.E.2d 1269; 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 680
Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa Concur

People v. Falciglia

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

As the Appellate Division properly concluded, defendant was not entitled to a missing witness charge (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424). The issue of reasonable suspicion is a mixed question of law and fact and, inasmuch as there is evidence in the record to support the lower courts’ determina *937 tion, this court’s review is at an end (see, People v Castro, 70 NY2d 943, 945). Defendant’s remaining arguments are unpreserved.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Reference

Full Case Name
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wayne Falciglia, Appellant
Cited By
14 cases
Status
Published