People v. Thomas
People v. Thomas
75 N.Y.2d 888; 553 N.E.2d 1022; 554 N.Y.S.2d 474; 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 570
People v. Thomas
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. Defendant’s request for the plea and sentence minutes of his accomplice as Rosario material (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, cert denied 368 US 866), asserted for the first time on appeal under CPL 380.70, is unpreserved because it was made to the trial court on a bare claim of entitlement with no specific response to the court’s request for a relevant legal predicate. The other claimed errors in the prosecutor’s summation are also either unpreserved or without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.