England v. Sanford
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Fallsview Glatt Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. Rosenfeld (Civil Court of the City of New York 2005)
- People v. Compton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Walker v. Pepsico, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- Garrison v. Wm. H. Clark Municipal Equipment, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- Mortka v. K-Mart Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Vamos v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (Civil Court of the City of New York 1995)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*930 OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law in granting plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint. In the absence of such abuse, this Court has no power to review the grant of a discretionary remedy. Hence, the only remaining issue presented by the question certified is whether the Appellate Division had the power to grant the requested relief. We conclude that it had this power, and pass on no other issue.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.