People v. Dien

New York Court of Appeals
People v. Dien, 77 N.Y.2d 885 (N.Y. 1991)
571 N.E.2d 69; 568 N.Y.S.2d 899; 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 309
Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa Concur

People v. Dien

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s sole argument on appeal is that a specific comment made by the prosecutor during summation violated *886 his rights to a fair trial by an impartial jury and to equal protection under the law. At the time of the prosecutor’s statement, however, defendant made only a general objection, thus failing to preserve his argument for this Court’s review (see, People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941, 942; People v Ford, 69 NY2d 775, 776).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Reference

Full Case Name
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald Dien, Appellant
Cited By
92 cases
Status
Published