Grasso v. Angerami
Cases that cite this one
262 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Ebewo v. Martinez (District Court, S.D. New York 2004)
- Cherfilus v. McAlmon (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- SAUTER, JOYCE v. CALABRETTA, PETER A. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Sauter ex rel. Sauter v. Calabretta (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Rodriguez v. Cesar (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Pommells v. Perez (N.Y. 2005)
- Piazza v. D'Anna (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Zafir v. Turbo Trans Corp. (New York Supreme Court 2001)
- Dufresne v. Cestra (New York Supreme Court 2000)
- Tatti v. Cummings (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Pagano v. Kingsbury (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Brown v. Saczawa (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Nahshal v. Chait (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Berthold v. Williams (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Berthold v. Williams (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Milek v. DPM Contr. Servs., Inc. (New York Supreme Court, Richmond County 2025)
- Philippe v. Islam (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Philippe v. Islam (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Saez v. Lyka Taxi Inc. (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2025)
- Horodova v. Richard (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2024)
- Horodova v. Richard (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2024)
- Shepherd v. Barry (New York Supreme Court, Queens County 2024)
- Shepherd v. Barry (New York Supreme Court, Queens County 2024)
- Anderson v. Iltcheva (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2024)
- Anderson v. Iltcheva (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2024)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
In opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d), plaintiff tendered proof of "serious injury” in inadmissible form, namely an unsworn doctor’s report. Inasmuch as plaintiff did not offer any excuse for his failure to provide the medical report in proper form, we need not consider whether proof of serious injury in
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.