People v. Gebrosky
New York Court of Appeals
People v. Gebrosky, 80 N.Y.2d 995 (N.Y. 1992)
592 N.Y.S.2d 650; 607 N.E.2d 797; 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 3892
People v. Gebrosky
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Defendant’s absence from a material part of his Sandoval hearing (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) violated his right to be present at all material stages of his trial (People v Beasley, 80 NY2d 981; People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656). The issue is reviewable, despite defendant’s failure to object, and the People’s contention that this case involves exceptional circumstances rendering defendant’s presence "superfluous” is unavailing (People v Dokes, supra, at 662).
Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The People of the State of New York v. Joseph Gebrosky
- Cited By
- 19 cases
- Status
- Published