People v. Cruz
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Favor (N.Y. 1993)
- People v. Seabrooks (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- People v. White (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- People v. Anderson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Hall (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Krouth (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Wiley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Mitchell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Givens (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Ballard (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Mitchell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Boyd (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Acero (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Rosado (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Brockenshire (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
The trial court improperly conducted a Sandoval hearing (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) in defendant’s absence, requiring a new trial (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656; People v Gebrosky, 80 NY2d 995). It is therefore unnecessary to consider defendant’s remaining contention.
Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum; Judge Smith taking no part.
Order reversed, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.