New York Court of Appeals, 1993

O'Connell v. Jacobs

O'Connell v. Jacobs
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 11, 1993
81 N.Y.2d 797; 595 N.Y.S.2d 388; 611 N.E.2d 289; 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 203
O'Connell v. Jacobs

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. We agree for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division (181 AD2d 1064) that the admissible evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict.

Concur: Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Ti-tone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.