New York Court of Appeals, 1994

People v. Leabo

People v. Leabo
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 6, 1994 · Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick Concur
644 N.E.2d 1376; 84 N.Y.2d 952; 620 N.Y.S.2d 820; 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 4115 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
People v. Leabo

Cases that cite this one

35 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant was sentenced to a one-to-three-year indeterminate term of imprisonment on his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a felony and a one-year determinate sentence on his conviction for fourth degree criminal mischief. As the court below noted, Penal Law § 70.35 is applicable, since the criminal mischief offense was committed before the indeterminate sentence was imposed. That statute, which provides that "service of an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment shall satisfy any definite sentence of imprisonment imposed on a person for an offense committed prior to the time the indeterminate sentence was imposed,” contemplates that the definite and indeterminate sentences will be served concurrently. Accordingly, the Appellate Division correctly modified defendant’s sentence to make the indeterminate and definite terms run concurrently rather than consecutively, as the trial court had directed.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.