MATTER OF TUG BUSTER BOUCHARD CORP. v. Wetzler
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Moran Towing Corp. v. Urbach (New York Supreme Court 1999)
- Moran Towing Corp. v. Urbach (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Moran Towing Corp. v. Urbach (N.Y. 2003)
- Moran Towing Corp. v. Urbach (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Bray Terminals, Inc. v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In the Matter of Tug Buster Bouchard Corporation et al., Respondents-Appellants,
v.
James W. Wetzler, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Appellant-Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, Albany (Andrew D. Bing and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for appellant-respondent.
Schulz & Associates, L.L.C., Melville (Thomas P. Schulz of counsel), for respondents-appellants.
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur.
*833MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to petitioners payable by respondent.
Inasmuch as the respondent State explicitly conceded the unconstitutionality of the Petroleum Business Tax regime as applied to petitioners, we affirm the decision of the Appellate Division (217 AD2d 192) and conclude that we need decide nothing more with respect to this case.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.