New York Court of Appeals, 1996

People v. Dickens

New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 10, 1996

88 N.Y.2d 1031; 673 N.E.2d 1237; 651 N.Y.S.2d 10; 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3054

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Cooper (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
People v. Redden (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
People v. Moya (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
People v. Pinkard (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
People v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
People v. Jackson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
People v. Brown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
People v. Otero (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
People v. Huntley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
People v. Monahan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
People v. Williams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The grounds defendant now advances for challenging the *1033lawfulness of the search were not presented to the trial court. We therefore conclude that defendant failed to preserve his present claims for this Court’s review.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.