New York Court of Appeals, 1997

Luck v. Fisk

Luck v. Fisk
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 22, 1997
90 N.Y.2d 979; 688 N.E.2d 1035; 665 N.Y.S.2d 953; 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 3223
Luck v. Fisk

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division. We note, however, that nothing in this Court’s affirmance implies that, under Election Law § 9-209 (2) (d), the central board of inspectors has the discretion not to open the ballot envelopes and count the votes after the three-day set-aside period.

*982Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.