New York Court of Appeals, 1998

People v. Hallman

New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 16, 1998 · Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley Concur

699 N.E.2d 423; 92 N.Y.2d 840; 677 N.Y.S.2d 64; 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1790 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

The People v. Shawn J. Sivertson (N.Y. 2017)
People v. McBride (N.Y. 2010)
People v. Sykes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
People v. Sykes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
People v. Fraser (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
The People of the State of New York v. John Gibson (N.Y. 2015)
People v. Gibson (N.Y. 2015)
People v. Wisdom (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
People v. Brown (N.Y. 2000)
People v. Feerick (N.Y. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. A determination of whether exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrantless entry and arrest of defendant involves a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.