People v. Graham

New York Court of Appeals June 3, 1999

People v. Graham, 715 N.E.2d 504 (N.Y. 1999)

93 N.Y.2d 934; 693 N.Y.S.2d 502; 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1213

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt Concur

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.

Whether “in any place” in Penal Law § 240.36 includes a private residence was disputed below but conceded by defendant on this appeal. Defendant’s present argument — that the statute so construed is void for vagueness — is unpreserved for our review, as is defendant’s remaining contention.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Reference

Full Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Damion M. Graham, Appellant
Cited By: 14 cases
Status: Published