New York Court of Appeals, 1999

People v. Graham

People v. Graham
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 3, 1999 · Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt Concur
715 N.E.2d 504; 93 N.Y.2d 934; 693 N.Y.S.2d 502; 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1213 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

People v. Graham

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.

Whether “in any place” in Penal Law § 240.36 includes a private residence was disputed below but conceded by defendant on this appeal. Defendant’s present argument — that the statute so construed is void for vagueness — is unpreserved for our review, as is defendant’s remaining contention.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.