Matter of Rose BB.
Matter of Rose BB.
93 N.Y.2d 1039; 719 N.E.2d 920; 697 N.Y.S.2d 560; 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2961
Cases that cite this one
20 later published cases cite this decision.
- 150 Centreville, LLC v. Lin Associates Architects, PC (New York Supreme Court 2013)
- Acito v. Acito (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- In re Carol S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Kalwasinski v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- In re Peer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Yenom Corp. v. 155 Wooster Street Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- In re the Estate of Rose BB. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Dallio v. Goord (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- In re the Estate of Rose BB. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Gibbs v. Miller (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- In re Rose BB. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- W.J.F. Realty Corp. v. Town of Southampton (District Court, E.D. New York 2002)
- Johnson v. Goord (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Knight v. Walsh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- In re the Estate of Rose BB. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- People v. Helliger (N.Y. 2001)
- Citibank (South Dakota) N. A. v. Ousterman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Cliff v. Eagen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Household Finance Corp. v. Dynan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Helliger (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Judge Ciparick taking no part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.