Zambrana v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals
Zambrana v. City of New York, 727 N.E.2d 573 (N.Y. 2000)
94 N.Y.2d 887; 706 N.Y.S.2d 76; 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 76
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt Concur

Zambrana v. City of New York

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the majority memorandum of the Appellate Division. We further note that plaintiff failed to identify any triable issue of fact with respect to whether defendant had notice of the reckless conduct of other skaters in order to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Reference

Full Case Name
Amy Zambrana, Appellant, v. City of New York Et Al., Respondents
Cited By
13 cases
Status
Published