New York Court of Appeals, 2000

Zambrana v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 17, 2000 · Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt Concur

727 N.E.2d 573; 94 N.Y.2d 887; 706 N.Y.S.2d 76; 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 76 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

Laurent v. Town of Oyster Bay (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
Fader v. Town of Oyster Bay (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Fader v. Town of Oyster Bay (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Roberts v. Boys & Girls Republic, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
Ballan v. Arena Management Group, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
Newcomb v. Guptill Holding Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
Reid v. Druckman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
Kramer v. Arbore (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
Vega v. County of Westchester (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
Lozito v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
Bleyer v. Recreational Management Service Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
Engstrom v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
People v. Tinkham (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the majority memorandum of the Appellate Division. We further note that plaintiff failed to identify any triable issue of fact with respect to whether defendant had notice of the reckless conduct of other skaters in order to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.