Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 2000

Zambrana v. City of New York

Zambrana v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 17, 2000 · Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt Concur
727 N.E.2d 573; 94 N.Y.2d 887; 706 N.Y.S.2d 76; 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 76 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Zambrana v. City of New York

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the majority memorandum of the Appellate Division. We further note that plaintiff failed to identify any triable issue of fact with respect to whether defendant had notice of the reckless conduct of other skaters in order to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑