People v. Valerio
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Maquila (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- The People v. Gregory Lee (N.Y. 2017)
- The People v. Tramel Cuencas (N.Y. 2023)
- People v. Henry (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- People v. John R. Simmons (N.Y. 2017)
- AMOS, ANDRE, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- OSTEEN, FELTON M., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Amos (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Amos (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Osteen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Osteen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- The People v. Jeffrey Mercado (N.Y. 2015)
- People v. Mercado (N.Y. 2015)
- CARR, TODD E., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. McFarlane (N.Y. 2013)
- People v. Carr (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Carr (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. May (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- People v. Leiva (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- People v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- People v. Hill (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- People v. Dewitt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- People v. Marasa (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- People v. Coley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determinations regarding the scope of the initial stop, the questioning of defendant about the clothing in his trunk, defendant’s consent to search the vehicle, the inventory search and the use of a drug-sniffing dog to search the vehicle all involve mixed questions of law and fact. Inasmuch as those determinations are supported by evidence in the record, they are beyond further review by this Court.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.