Dilluvio v. City of New York
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision.
- Eddy v. John Hummel Custom Builders, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Salazar v. Novalex Contracting Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- James v. Alpha Painting & Constr. Co., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Toefer v. Long Islan Rail Road (N.Y. 2005)
- Pitang v. Beacon Broadway Co., LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Davis v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Palumbo v. Transit Technologies, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Palomeque v. Capital Improvement Services, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Siguenza v. Cemusa, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Juett v. Lucente (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Juett v. Lucente (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Fontaine v. Juniper Associates (New York Supreme Court 2009)
- Hill v. Stahl (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Bray v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Modeste v. Mega Contracting, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Lavore v. Kir Munsey Park 020 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Vaneer v. 993 Intervale Avenue Housing Development Fund Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Marvin v. Korean Air Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Amo v. Little Rapids Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Rice v. Board of Education (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Santoro v. New York City Transit Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Chiarello v. J&D Leasing Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Hughes v. County of Nassau (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.
The Appellate Division correctly determined that, as a matter of law, the accident did not result from an elevation-related risk (see, Bond v York Hunter Constr., 95 NY2d 883; Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509, 514-515).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.