Dankberg v. Spuches
Dankberg v. Spuches
98 N.Y.2d 706; 778 N.E.2d 545
Dankberg v. Spuches
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs (see, Matter of Rivera v Espada, 98 NY2d 422 [decided today]). Spuches’ remaining contention that the New York City Board of Elections improperly invalidated his designating petition is without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Graffeo. Taking no part: Judge Rosenblatt.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.