New York Court of Appeals, 2004

People v. Celaj

People v. Celaj
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 12, 2004 · Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read Concur
808 N.E.2d 352; 1 N.Y.3d 588; 776 N.Y.S.2d 216; 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 54 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

People v. Celaj

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination of reasonable suspicion made by Supreme Court and affirmed by the Appellate Division involves a mixed question of law and fact which is supported by evidence in the record. Consequently, the issue is beyond further review by this Court.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Grapfeo and Read concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.