Zanki v. Cahill
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ohadi v. Magnetic Constr. Group Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Maldonado v. New York City Housing Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Quintana v. TCR, Tennis Club of Riverdale, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Quintana v. TCR, Tennis Club of Riverdale, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Raghu v. New York City Housing Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Mantzoutsos v. 150 Street Produce Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Santiago v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Acunia v. New York City Department of Education (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Morgan v. Windham Realty, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Johnson v. Samuel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.
The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the alleged injuries resulted from a dangerous recurring condition of which defendant Cushman & Wakefield had actual or constructive notice.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.