New York Court of Appeals, 2004

People v. Reynoso

New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 10, 2004 · Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith Concur

814 N.E.2d 456; 2 N.Y.3d 820; 781 N.Y.S.2d 284; 2 N.Y. 820; 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1541 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

60 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

People v. Coley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
People v. Garvin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
The People v. Sean Garvin (N.Y. 2017)
People v. Lockley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
People v. Rodriguez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
People v. Harris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
People v. Rodriguez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
People v. Ryan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
People v. Leftenant (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
People v. Lewis (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
People v. Shaw (N.Y. 2026)
People v. Bryant (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
People v. James (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
People v. Coleman (Amanda) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
People v. Osbourne (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
People v. Lowe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
People v. Santos (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
The People v. Darrell Spencer (N.Y. 2017)
People v. Spencer (N.Y. 2017)
People v. Prince (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
People v. Evans (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
People v. Evans (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
People v. Rahman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
People v. Grant (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
People v. Granger (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We reject defendant’s claim that his warrantless arrest violated Payton v New York (445 US 573 [1980]). The record reveals that the arrest occurred either after defendant exited his home voluntarily or while he stood in his doorway.

Further, there is no merit to defendant’s claim that his constitutional right to confront witnesses was violated when the trial court allowed the People to elicit a statement that a non-testifying codefendant had made to a detective. The statement was admitted not to establish the truth of the matter asserted, but rather to show the detective’s state of mind. As the United States Supreme Court recently observed, “[t]he [Confrontation] Clause . . . does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted” (Crawford v Washington, 541 US —, — n 9, 124 S Ct 1354, 1369 n 9 [2004], citing Tennessee v Street, 471 US 409, 414 [1985]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

*778 On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.