New York Court of Appeals, 2004

Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC

Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 12, 2004
1 N.Y.3d 590

Bruker v. SULLIVAN AND LIAPAKIS, PC

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as (1) dismissed appeals from Supreme Court orders denying reargument, (2) affirmed so much of a different Supreme Court order as denied appellant’s cross motion for leave to amend the complaint, and (3) denied appellant’s motion to enlarge the record on appeal, dismissed upon the ground that such portions of the order sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.