Jackson v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals August 31, 2004

Jackson v. Smith, 3 N.Y.3d 667 (N.Y. 2004)

817 N.E.2d 821; 784 N.Y.S.2d 4; 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 2140

Opinion of the Court

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see e.g. Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298).

Reference

Full Case Name: In the Matter of Nathaniel Jackson v. Joseph Smith
Status: Published