New York Court of Appeals, 2005

People v. Buonincontri

New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 15, 2005 · Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith Concur

843 N.E.2d 1143; 6 N.Y.3d 726; 810 N.Y.S.2d 403; 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3346 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Wilson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
People v. Flowers (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
People v. Delarosa (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
People v. Miranda (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
People v. Vogel (N.Y. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The defendant was informed on the record that she had the right to be present during questioning of a prospective juror concerning the ability to be fair and impartial. The Appellate Division *727 properly determined that defendant failed to present an adequate record to overcome the presumption of regularity (see People v Velasquez, 1 NY3d 44, 48 [2003]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.