People v. West
New York Court of Appeals
People v. West, 833 N.E.2d 704 (N.Y. 2005)
5 N.Y.3d 740; 800 N.Y.S.2d 369; 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 1251
Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith Concur
People v. West
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. We need not decide whether defendant could raise his Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]) argument for the first time on a motion to set aside his sentence pursuant to CPL 440.20 in view of the Court’s holding that New York’s persistent felony offender statute is constitutional (see People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61 [2005]).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Oliver Giola West, Jr., Appellant
- Cited By
- 8 cases
- Status
- Published