People v. Lopez
Cases that cite this one
28 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- BAKERX, ROBERT, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Bakerx (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Bakerx (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Giacopelli (County Court of New York, Putnam County 2024)
- People v. Giacopelli (County Court of New York, Putnam County 2024)
- People v. Brown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- People v. Brinkley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- People v. Terry (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Denis (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Wynn (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Wynn (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Gilmore (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. France (N.Y. 2009)
- People v. Burch (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- People v. France (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- People v. Long (N.Y. 2007)
- People v. Roldan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. Thomason (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. Rivera (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. Cambridge (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. Davis (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Matter of Adam I. (Queens Family Court 2007)
- People v. Hickson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- People v. Kirk (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- People v. McDowell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The suppression court did not commit reversible error in denying the Mapp/Dunaway portion of defendant’s suppression motion without a hearing. Given “(1) the face of the pleadings, (2) assessed in conjunction with the context of the motion, and (3) defendant’s access to information,” defendant’s allegations in support of his motion were too conclusory to warrant a hearing (People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415, 426 [1993]; see also People v Jones, 95 NY2d 721, 728-729 [2001]). Defendant gave a written postarrest statement, disclosed to him with the People’s voluntary disclosure form, that describes events very close in time and place to one of the charged crimes. The statement says that “one of the officers was with” one of the robbery victims, “so I knew they were looking for us, so I ran,” and also that, before his arrest, defendant threw a gun away. The statement on its face shows probable cause for defendant’s arrest, and defendant failed to controvert it in his motion papers.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.