New York Court of Appeals, 2006

In THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN v. Miner

In THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN v. Miner
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 8, 2006
7 N.Y.3d 735; 850 N.E.2d 1163; 818 N.Y.S.2d 188; 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 1433
In THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN v. Miner

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929, Cardozo, Ch.J.]).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.