Santos v. Baldwin-Endico Realty Associates
New York Court of Appeals
Santos v. Baldwin-Endico Realty Associates, 6 N.Y.3d 887 (N.Y. 2006)
850 N.E.2d 670
Santos v. Baldwin-Endico Realty Associates
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division majority that plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether the injuries alleged resulted from a dangerous condition of which defendant had actual or constructive notice (see Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233, 240-241 [1976]).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Danilio Santos, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Luisa Almanzar v. Baldwin-Endico Realty Associates
- Status
- Published