People v. Redzeposki
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Renner (Yon) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- People v. Smith (Stacey) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- People v. Ramos (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- People v. Forrest (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- People v. Baynes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. DeJesus-Plaza (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Pagon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- People v. Redzeposki (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to that Court for consideration of the facts (see CPL 470.25 [2] [d]; 470.40 [2] [b]).
“Before proceeding in defendant’s absence, the court should . . . ma[ke] inquiry and recite[ ] on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899 [1990]). Here, the trial court properly inquired into defendant’s absence and reasonably determined — based on the court’s own observation as well as defense counsel’s explanation — that defendant had deliberately left the courthouse shortly before announcement of the jury verdict.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.