New York Court of Appeals, 2008

People v. Allen

People v. Allen
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 10, 2008 · Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones Concur
881 N.E.2d 214; 9 N.Y.3d 1013; 851 N.Y.S.2d 118 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

People v. Allen

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*1015 Whether the circumstances of a particular case rise to the level of reasonable suspicion is a mixed question of law and fact, beyond our review if the determination is supported by the record. A determination that the police possessed the common-law right to inquire is also a mixed question of law and fact subject to this Court’s limited review. Here, record evidence supports the lower courts’ determinations regarding both reasonable suspicion and the common-law right to inquire (see People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210 [1976]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.