New York Court of Appeals, 2008

Whalen v. DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY

New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 17, 2008

11 N.Y.3d 885

Opinion

11 N.Y.3d 885 (2008)

ALICE WHALEN, Respondent,
v.
DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY, Now Known as DEGRAFF, FOY, KUNZ & DEVINE, LLP, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted November 3, 2008.Decided December 17, 2008.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that *886 the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Whalen v. DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY

Opinion

ALICE WHALEN, Respondent,v.DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY, Now Known as DEGRAFF, FOY, KUNZ & DEVINE, LLP, Appellant.

ALICE WHALEN, Respondent,
v.
DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY, Now Known as DEGRAFF, FOY, KUNZ & DEVINE, LLP, Appellant.