Schosek v. Amherst Paving, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Boderick v. R.Y. Management Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Divens v. Finger Lakes Gaming & Racing Assn., Inc., LP (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- PARO, CAMERON E. v. PIEDMONT LAND AND CATTLE, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Kelley v. Schneck (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Kelley v. Schneck (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Paro v. Piedmont Land & Cattle (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Paro v. Piedmont Land & Cattle (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Petito v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Golisano v. Keeler Construction Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and that part of defendant Amherst Paving, Inc.’s motion that sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it denied. A triable issue of fact exists as to whether Amherst Paving created or exacerbated a dangerous condition.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.