New York Court of Appeals, 2009

People v. Middleton

People v. Middleton
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 17, 2009
12 N.Y.3d 737; 904 N.E.2d 499

People v. Middleton

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed without costs.

Defendant’s constitutional arguments are unpreserved. The record supports the determination of the courts below that defendant is a level three sex offender.

Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.