People v. Middleton
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Wilkinson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- People v. Strong (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- WOLLEK, MICHAEL J., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Wollek (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Wollek (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Duart (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Teagle (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- People v. Larkin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed without costs.
Defendant’s constitutional arguments are unpreserved. The record supports the determination of the courts below that defendant is a level three sex offender.
Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.