Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 2009

Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.

Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 20, 2009 · Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones Concur
13 N.Y.3d 811; 918 N.E.2d 944

Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.

Opinion

*812 OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding defendants’ actual or constructive notice of the particular dangerous condition that allegedly caused her injuries (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838 [1986]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑