New York Court of Appeals, 2009

ARTS4ALL, LTD. v. Hancock

ARTS4ALL, LTD. v. Hancock
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 20, 2009
13 N.Y.3d 812; 918 N.E.2d 945
ARTS4ALL, LTD. v. Hancock

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. The courts below did not abuse their discretion in dismissing defendant’s counterclaims pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) {see Arts4All, Ltd. v Hancock, 12 NY3d 846 [2009]). Defendant’s remaining argument is without merit.

Concur: Judges Ciparick, Grapfeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.