New York Court of Appeals, 2009

Arts4All, Ltd. v. Hancock

Arts4All, Ltd. v. Hancock
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 12, 2009
12 N.Y.3d 846; 909 N.E.2d 83
Arts4All, Ltd. v. Hancock

Cases that cite this one

33 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, *847should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered as unnecessary.

The courts below applied the correct legal standards, properly considered all the facts and circumstances of the case, and did not abuse their discretion in dismissing plaintiffs’ remaining cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) (see Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 123 [1999]).

Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.