FLOMENBAUM v. New York University
New York Court of Appeals
FLOMENBAUM v. New York University, 929 N.E.2d 403 (N.Y. 2010)
14 N.Y.3d 901; 903 N.Y.S.2d 339
Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones Concur
FLOMENBAUM v. New York University
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. Plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact regarding whether defendant New York University breached the parties’ underlying contract (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 560 [1980]). Plaintiffs remaining contentions lack merit.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Neal Flomenbaum, Appellant, v. New York University, Respondent
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published