FLOMENBAUM v. New York University
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Winprovit - Solucoes Inteligentes S.A. v. Z & A Infotek Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 2025)
- White & Case LLP v. Shipman Assoc., LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- White & Case LLP v. Shipman Assoc., LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- AmTrust North America, Inc. v. Signify Insurance Ltd. (District Court, S.D. New York 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. Plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact regarding whether defendant New York University breached the parties’ underlying contract (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 560 [1980]). Plaintiffs remaining contentions lack merit.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.