People v. Ramirez
Cases that cite this one
75 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- The People v.Kenneth Nealon (N.Y. 2015)
- The People v. Terrance L. Mack (N.Y. 2016)
- People v. Vilella (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2026)
- People v. Bedeau (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Crawford (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- People v. Scavone (Richard) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Joseph v. Conway (District Court, E.D. New York 2023)
- People v. Carter (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- People v. Carter (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- People v. Pinkston (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- People v. Pinkston (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- People v. Martinez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- People v. Perry (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- People v. Jones (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- People v. Bonds (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. Ramos (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. Hackett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. Slattery (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Gibson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Cowell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Webster (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Brito (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. McClean (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Deokoro (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. LaDuke (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Contrary to defendant’s argument, the Appellate Division properly concluded that the verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a reasonable jury could have inferred that defendant constructively possessed the drugs and drug paraphernalia located in an apartment in which defendant himself was found (see generally People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]).
Moreover, although the record is silent as to whether Supreme Court showed the jury note to counsel as required in *826 People v O’Rama (78 NY2d 270 [1991]), defense counsel had notice of the contents of the note and the court’s response, and failed to object at that time, when the error could have been cured. Accordingly, defendant’s claim is unpreserved for review (see People v Starling, 85 NY2d 509, 516 [1995]; see also People v Kadarko, 14 NY3d 426, 429-430 [2010]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.