New York Court of Appeals, 2010

People v. Rivera

People v. Rivera
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 18, 2010 · Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones Concur
925 N.E.2d 580; 14 N.Y.3d 753; 898 N.Y.S.2d 542 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

People v. Rivera

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant has not demonstrated the absence of a legitimate explanation for his appellate counsel’s failure to brief the issue whether his guilty plea should be vacated under People v Catu (4 NY3d 242 [2005]; see People v Borrell, 12 NY3d 365, 369 [2009]; People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.