People v. Leopold
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Rivera (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- People v. Kemp (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Harris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Harris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- CAMERON, MICHAEL, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Cameron (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Wyatt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Bowles (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Brabham (N.Y. 2010)
- People v. Flax (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. Rivera (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. Carlton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. Vega (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
Correction Law § 168-n (3) requires the court fixing a sex offender’s risk level determination to “render an order setting forth . . . the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determinations are based.” Here, neither the Supreme Court nor the Appellate Division order set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law justifying the risk level determination. We therefore remit this case to Supreme Court to specify its findings of fact and conclusions of law (see People v Smith, 11 NY3d 797, 798 [2008]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.