Anderson v. Young & Rubicam
Anderson v. Young & Rubicam
14 N.Y.3d 909; 930 N.E.2d 761; 904 N.Y.S.2d 688; 2010 NY Slip Op 73544; 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 1232
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. RD Legal Funding, LLC (District Court, S.D. Illinois 2018)
- Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. ESPN, Inc. (N.Y. 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. The order affirming the denial of the CPLR 4404 motion to set aside the verdict does not finally determine the action (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.