Roddy v. Nederlander Producing Co. of America, Inc.
Roddy v. Nederlander Producing Co. of America, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiff’s complaint as against defendants
Plaintiff did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of defendants’ negligence. The issue of defendants’ negligence was previously determined in an Appellate Division order granting defendants summary judgment on a third-party contractual indemnification claim against plaintiffs employer, third-party defendant Abhann Productions, Inc. Plaintiff had no interest in the outcome of the third-party indemnification claim. Plaintiff thus had neither incentive to litigate the motion for summary judgment nor adequate notice that the issue of defendants’ negligence could be conclusively decided against him. Under these circumstances, the law of the case doctrine does not preclude plaintiff from litigating the issue of defendants’ negligence.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Pat Roddy v. Nederlander Producing Company of America, Inc., , (And a Third-Party Action.)
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published