Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.
Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.
17 N.Y.3d 908; 958 N.E.2d 119
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Raynor v Landmark Chrysler, 18 NY3d 48 [2011] [decided today]).
Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.